| August 15, 2006The 2006 CBBF Canadian Fitness & Figure Championships
A Bodybuilding Show without Poses!
At
this years CBBF Canadian Fitness & Figure Championships, over 90 superbly
conditioned athletes journeyed to Edmonton, Alberta, many with the dream of competing for
their province at Canadas top figure/fitness competition. A lot of these athletes
arrived in Edmonton excited, apprehensive, and enthusiastic at the prospect of standing on
stage and competing against their peers. However, something went wrong what should
have been a fun, rewarding and fulfilling experience, turned into a disappointing exercise
in frustration for many. So what happened?
In my opinion, it was the standard that the winners
displayed in terms of condition and muscle development, which was unattainable for the
majority of the other competitors. Dont get me wrong, I dont intend to demean
or single out any of the winners, as they did what they think they have to do in order to
win, but I must confess that I really didnt have an answer for a lot of the
disappointed athletes who came up to me following the show, complaining that they were
totally frustrated with the huge mass and muscularity that many of the top winners
possessed. Most claimed that there is no way they could ever begin to develop such a
physique, at least not naturally. Many told me the only reason they got out of
bodybuilding was to get away from the excessive size and muscularity required to be
competitive. They were simply looking for an alternative competition in place of
bodybuilding, and figure was the perfect answer. Now the same excessive muscularity
and thick muscular development is creeping into figure, which is the reason why
womens bodybuilding is just about dead.
Figure competitions are growing, with huge numbers of girls
filling out the many categories in competitions all across Canada. Obviously, these women
are trying to tell us something! But are we listening? From what I saw at this years
CBBF Canadian Fitness & Figure Championships, the answer is no! This became clear when
many of these dissatisfied competitors confided in me that they would not compete again at
the national level until things changed. In fact, they were looking at other organizations
where excessive development is scored down.

Ontario's Marnie Holley won the fitness Tall class at
the 2006 CBBF Canadian Championships and at the CBBF National World Qualifier. According
to Garry, "Marnie sports the ideal structure and conditioning that I feel the judges
should look at as a model."

Monica Brant is considered to be one of the world's
best professional figure competitors. Garry asks, "Have any of the CBBF judges even
seen an IFBB pro figure competition?
|
I will argue this fact with anyone: The look
that many competitors displayed at this competition is literally impossible to achieve
without the help of performance-enhancing drugs. Yes, I probably hit a nerve, and if
anyone is offended, send me the results of your negative drug test and I will apologize.
In fact, we just ran the CBBF National World Qualifier in Toronto where the winners are
officially drug tested, and I saw very few winners from the Canadian Fitness & Figure
Championships there other than Ontarios symmetrical and beautifully shaped Marnie
Holley. Marnie won the Tall class in fitness at the Canadian Championships and then went
on to take the Tall class at the Qualifier, earning a spot on the Canadian team to the
IFBB World Championships. In my opinion, Marnie sports the ideal structure and
conditioning that I feel the judges should look at as a model. It is puzzling that there
seems to be different criteria for picking fitness winners, as they dont seem to
possess the same muscular development as the figure winners.
I have covered the bodybuilding scene for close to 30
years, and many of this years top figure athletes at the CBBF Canadian Fitness &
Figure Championships looked to me more like bodybuilders than figure athletes. The
noticeably deep voices, square jaws, wide shoulders, narrow hips, flowing full muscles are
something I have seen in the relaxed lineup at womens bodybuilding competitions for
many years. In fact, I found myself often bored with the endless relaxed comparison poses
in this figure competition and was hoping the chief judge would instruct the lineup to hit
a front-double-biceps pose!
My question is: Who is setting the criteria for what we
should be looking for in CBBF amateur figure competitions? It is my understanding that the
purpose of promoting the Canadian Championships is to find and reward the winners with the
opportunity of turning pro and competing against the best pro figure competitors in the
world. Have any of the CBBF judges even seen an IFBB pro figure competition? Have
they even studied the contest reports in the magazines or on the Internet to see just who
is winning these pro shows?
I have seen every Figure and Fitness Olympia competition as
well as every Figure and Fitness International competition (part of the Arnold Classic)
held to date, and, yes, the winners display impressive muscularity and shape, but the size
and mass is toned down. I use the sexy and exquisitely shaped Monica Brant as an example.
I have known and seen her compete since 1990 and no one, under any stretch of the
imagination, could ever accuse her of possessing excessive muscular development. In
fact, if the judges didnt know who she was, I wonder how she would have placed at
this years CBBF Canadian Figure Championships if she had entered. In spite of
her less than massive musculature, she has consistently placed in the top three in pro
figure competitions for the past several years.
Without question, the CBBF has to address the growing
problem of picking overly muscular women for their winners in figure competitions. What
are we doing? Didnt the IFBB issue a directive instructing officials to score down
excessive muscular development with the 20%-less rule? If that was the case at this
years figure/fitness championships, I didnt see it!
I think the problem is with our judges. Most have a
background in mens bodybuilding and that is what they are comfortable judging. So,
all their judging is based on muscle and muscularity and it takes a really trained eye to
look beyond these obvious criteria. They have to be educated to change those ideals into
looking for balance, pleasing shape, grace, poise, natural physical beauty, and
eye-pleasing esthetics.
Ask yourself this question: If you had a product to sell,
would you want that particular winner to represent your company in an ad for a product
that you wanted to market to the public? Would your customers find this model
attractive? If the answer is no, then theres a problem.
If we want our sport to grow, turning off the public is not
the answer. We are even turning off many of our own competitors! I fear that if this trend
continues, figure competitions in Canada will go the way of womens bodybuilding. So
lets get our act together, develop strict guidelines, and have the guts to reverse
this disturbing trend of picking excessive size and muscularity before it is too late; in
fact, I fear that the genie is already out of the bottle and it may be too late to put her
back in!
...Garry Bartlett
garryb@seriousaboutmuscle.com
SeriousAboutMuscle.com contributor Garry Bartlett is
the leading authority on Canadian bodybuilding, fitness and figure. Garry's "Canadian
Corner" column has appeared in MuscleMag for over 25 years and has provided
an unsurpassed level of exposure and publicity for Canadian bodybuilding, fitness and
figure enthusiasts.
|